0082 - Sicha Regarding International Dateline

00:01 In the there's the famous about if a person crosses the . If a person crosses the international date line in the middle of , so the Rabbi that you have to continue counting your own , even though it'll be different than the place that you will come to. And but mainly the Rabbi comes out with a that the , you will have to have your own . The Rabbi is in England and goes into into this whole . Then in page two eighty-eight, the whole is printed over again. So people ask, "Why did that-- how did that happen? Why did the, that get printed over again?" So I just wanna tell you that when they're preparing the to print, so every safer of has a lot of his surface in the back, that in addition to the that came out that year or those few years in the series of , every volume has his surface, that there are other or other letters that have a to those times of the year, those parshas of the week. So those that were available at that time were added as his surface to . And would go give into the Rebbe these letters, these his surface, and the Rebbe would send it out, and this would become the his surface. We happened to get a letter that the Rebbe wrote before the . He had to Rebbe Tzahal Vilshansky, who lived in Australia. He came to the Rebbe for . And he crossed the date line. He

01:28 went across in middle of . So then they told him all kinds of and . So when he came back, he wrote to the Rebbe, who was only the son-in-law of the Rebbe at that time, to explain to him what is this whole union of all of a sudden the day changes, and you're back a day, earlier a day, and the . So he wrote to the Rebbe, and the Rebbe answered him a very long letter, explaining simply what the end of the is, and all that's , all the sides to the , whether you should count your own , not count your own , count both , and comes to , how you do , all kinds of possibilities. Very letter. But the Rebbe, at the end of the letter, doesn't come to the same conclusion like in the in . There he, the, in comes to conclusion clearly that you have to keep your own . But there, he remains with exactly what to do. Now, we would really like, we would like to print that letter because that letter explains the union very good. But we had a problem. How could we print that letter when the in the letter is different than the ? So we specifically sent him that letter to the Rebbe and wrote to the Rebbe, "We'd like to print this letter in the surface, but the is different, so what should we do? Should we not print it, or what should we do?" So the Rebbe was

02:37 a little bit, made a few changes in the letter itself, and he sent it out, and he wrote, "We should re-- we should print it." But the problem we have that the in the , in the is different. So the Rebbe said, "This is what you should add. You should write after this letter these words, ." That this letter that we just printed is just the first , and it's just a discussion. "" And later on, the Rebbe, he's writing this himself, but he's writing what we should write, that he looked into it again, discussed it again, the . And he did come to a . And then , to make it complete, in the we will repeat the , which means the that was printed in after it-- so even though it was printed already, the we should reprint the . So it was Rebbe's thing, idea that we should bring, print the letter. But in order not to be a contradiction to the , we should after that write these words, that this was only a , but later the Rebbe came to a . And we are reprinting the , and we printed the whole that is printed right in . That's why they printed the is reprinted here in the surface because if we would just print that letter, it would seem a contradiction. But now we understand the whole say that this was the way the Rebbe thought first, having a , and later on, he came to a

03:58 .