0735 - The Rebbe Changed or Added to What He Said Part 5 - Correcting Sicha to be in Name of Maggid

00:01 Another example of something that the Rebbe said, and later he explained it, and that is in the Farbrengen of Shabbos Bereishit Tov Shenam and Gimel, the Rebbe mentioned a vort in the name of the Baal Shem Tov concerning the Gemara where it says that if someone doesn't have enough money to buy food for Shabbos, Lovo Alai Vani Pareia. Deibish says borrow, and I will pay. And he said that the Baal Shem Tov asked the Kashe, why does it have to be that way? There's another way possible. Deibish should make a nes that the person should have money. Deibish should give him money. If he doesn't have, Deibish should make a nes and give him money. Why does Deibish have to make it so that he will borrow, and Deibish later will pay him? And the Baal Shem Tov answers that since you're not allowed to have a noah from Mais and Nissim, so if Deibish gives him money b'derech hanes, he probably maybe won't have a noah from it. But if Deibish tells him to borrow, that's derech hateva. Then Deibish pays, that's not called hanoah from Nissim because there's a din that hameder noah mechavarei, parei chavarei. If you make a neder from your chavrei, you should have a noah from him. He's allowed to pay your debt because he's not giving it to you directly. The same thing, if Deibish pays it, it's not giving you directly, so it's not called Deibish is making a nes for you. And the Rebbe quoted it

01:21 in the name of the Baal Shem Tov. The Rebbe was magid the Sichos, the Sichos for Parashat Toldos, which later went into the volume of Chelek Yud of the Likud HaSichos. The Rebbe mentions this, but he quotes it in the name of the Magid. He doesn't mention the whole L'Richis. He just says after he quotes Lovo Alai, et cetera, he says, Urei Eirtira L'Araba Magid B'Sefer. Look Eirtira of the Mizrachi Magid B'Sefer. And then the Rebbe added a line or two lines. V'chein tzorich liyos ba'arishimas vorim d'isva de Shabbos Parashas Bereishit Tov Shenam et Gimel, shezehu teirah saraba magid uli ha'bashem tov. That when the Rebbe quoted the Magid, he said that's how it's supposed to be written in the Hanocha of the Farbrengen of Shabbos Bereishit Tov Shenam et Gimel, that this is a Torah of the Magid, not of the Baal Shem Tov. Which means that he said it in the name of the Baal Shem Tov, but here the Rebbe found an opportunity to write that that has to be changed there. So when the Hanocha was written, it says there, if you look in the Hanocha, it says that this is a Torah of the Magid. But originally, the Rebbe said it's from the Baal Shem Tov. So here's another example. The Rebbe said one way, and later he wrote a different way. Now, probably there is someplace else where it's, or some people feel it's from the Baal Shem Tov, and b'meila, that's why the Rebbe. But to be printed,

02:41 to be written, it has to be from the name of the Magid because that's the Sefer that's printed. But we find another example where the Rebbe did this. And some people asked me when they looked at it, they didn't understand what the Rebbe means here. This is how it's supposed to be in the Rishonim, which means Hanocha of Shabbos Bereishit Tov Shenam et Gimel. They look in the Hanocha, and it says that this is the Magid because the Hanocha was given out already after the Rebbe wrote that piece. But the Chafchili said it's from the Baal Shem Tov. And here he writes that after he writes here that it's from the Magid, he writes, this is what you're supposed to write also in the Hanocha of the Farbrengen of Shabbos Parashas Bereishit Tov Shenam et Gimel.