0615 - The Rebbe Added a Part to the Maamor at the End of the Farbrengen

00:01 In the farbrengen of Chayel Tov Shin Lamed Beis, something interesting happened. At the end of the farbrengen, when the Rebbe already started saying which nigun to sing, like first he said they should sing Avinu Malkeinu, then the Rebbe said like this, "In the maimer," which he said, "you have to add something." And he says, "And I don't know why it was skipped. In the place where I spoke in the maimer, that Chayel, pshat is it gives chayas into the nionim of Elul, so there you have to add these words, that this is bedugmas-- similar to what the Magid explains on the pasuk, If a person does it to live with them." So the Magid teaches us through this that a Yid does a mitzvah, then vachai bahem means that he's mamshe chayas in the osias hamachshav v'ha'dibav haramays, and in the mitzvah itself, as you have the Bier on this in Eirav Teisf and the Tzemach Tzedek. And the Rebbe said, "This is a shaiches to the maimer in this place where he spoke about this inyan." Then he told them to sing a Simchas-- Simchas Torah day nigun. They sang the Hakofes nigun, which is the Rebbe's Hakofes nigun. And when they finished, the Rebbe said, "This is a gute nigun. Nicho babal gemeindem tatens nigun." I meant my father's nigun, and they sang the nigun Hakofes of the Rebbe's father. But what I'm trying to bring out that the Rebbe said that this piece was skipped and belongs in the maimer. Now, it's

01:20 very interesting because there were many times in the farbrengen the Rebbe said the maimer, and after the maimer, in the sichas, he added biurim and continued the inyonim that he spoke about in the maimer. But he never said that you should know that this is skipped in the maimer because that was not part of the maimer. Because there is a difference, obviously, between things which are said in the maimer by the Rebbe and things which are said in the sicha. So when the Rebbe said a maimer, and later he added biurim or things, an addition on top of the inyonim in the maimer, that was a sicha. So the part of the maimer is the maimer, and that has this gedert, separate inyon of a maimer, separate level of a maimer, and the other one is only a sicha. Obviously, this is when the Rebbe said this as it belongs in the maimer, and he didn't just continue saying a sicha and say another vort in this inyan. He could have just explained that this that we said that Chayel brings chayas in Elul and explained that this is connected to the vort of the Magid. He said it belongs in the maimer, which shows us that this is something that belongs in the maimer. So it has the gedert of the maimer, not the gedert of a sicha, even though-- And he says he doesn't know why it was skipped in the maimer. But this is very important to know that there is gedarim

02:25 in the maimer, gedarim in the sicha. Behem is similar to this, not only by a maimer and a sicha, but also if something was said by a farbrengen, a sicha, for instance, and later the Rebbe added something to it, it's also a different gedert. As we know that sometimes the Rebbe would, after a farbrengen, send out setlach to the Manichim, to the Chezrim, with adding a few points to the maimer. So I remember, for instance, once the Rebbe sent out a setlach Motzei Shabbos, and the setlach started like this, to the hanoche of the farbrengen, loheysiv, to add, v'chatzoy a igul. In parentheses, underline the word chatsoy a igul, parentheses, and the Rebbe wrote what to add. But the Rebbe wrote that should be in parentheses. Why? So the pashut we understood it is because it wasn't said by the farbrengen, so if you're gonna put it in tanoche, you should make sure that it's in parentheses. Another time, the Rebbe wrote very clear. He wrote a setlach Motzei Shabbos. I think it was Motzei Shabbos, or maybe Sunday, and he wrote like this, to add in the rad. And then in parentheses, the Rebbe wrote, v'mozgir, in parentheses. And he wrote, since I didn't mention it by the farbrengen. So since he didn't mention the farbrengen, when it goes into the hanoche, it has to be clear that this is not part of the farbrengen. It has to be in chatsoy a igul. So we see here that even that, what the Rebbe said

03:45 in public by farbrengen is one thing, and what he added later is a different level. I don't know which gedarim know. I don't know what the inyonim are, but there's two different inyonim. It's interesting that l'poel, the Manichim usually did not really pay attention to this, and if there was something the Rebbe added, it went in the farbrengen. I don't think that always they made sure that you should know that this was not said with the farbrengen. Also, when they get a setlach, when you would ask the Rebbe a shailah after the farbrengen, the Rebbe would answer. So those answers would go into the hanoche, sometimes in the bottom if it was a side thing, and sometimes in the teich, in middle where it belongs, it would go in. So they were not so middayek that it should be separate. But by the Rebbe, we see there are different gedarim, so it's a different gedert of what's in the maimer. And therefore, this inyan from Chayel Tov Shin Lamed Beis belongs in the gedert of the maimer. But in other times, it's a sicha. Even though it's behemshat to the maimer and it's in the Bier on the maimer, it's a se- a sicha, gedert of a sicha. And then sometimes it's not even that. It's not even a sicha of a farbrengen. It's the Rebbe adding an addition, and that's a different gedert, whatever that pshat should be. But here we see that these are the different gedarim.