0495 - Omitted Parts in the Hanacha Because They Were Sharp Part 3 - Always People Who Have Complaints

00:01 I would write-- like to repeat a few things that are missing in the Hanoch from the Farbrengen of Shabbos Parshas Vayigash tof shin chof tes. Actually, sh- before Shabbos, the Rebbe said there won't be a Farbrengen. But lepel mamish, it came Shabbos, there was a Farbrengen. And the Rebbe spoke about it. He said that even though he said there won't be a Farbrengen, but the reason he did fab-- is Farbrengen is because of a dover chadash, because something new that happened. And the way he explained in the Farbrengen is because mamish, close to Shabbos, they reached close to the moon, and the Rebbe said that everything that we see in the world, we have to take a lesson of Eidah Hashem. So he wanted to take-- tell us the lesson of Eidah Hashem from that. Also, there was some radio program that happened, and the Rebbe wanted to talk about that. But before that, he said the simple dover chadash, what was there that he did Farbrengen because something new that happened, is because they wrote into the Rebbe a letter asking him to Farbrengen with tainus. And he said that the people who wrote the letter are really not shaiches to come with a taina. But there's always a kluginger, some smart aleck, that he put them up to it and asked them to write him with tainus. They on their own would not write it. And he asked them, put them up to it, that they should ask, have tainus, and the Rebbe

01:15 used the lashon on krichn in enge-- an engen ort, and to climb, stick to a very narrow place. In other words, to have tainus to the Rebbe with something that the Rebbe didn't wanna do, you have to have the guts to it. And these are people who did it, but the people who wrote it didn't really... Were not-- They were not people of that kind. They would not have written it themselves, but when they untergeshtelt, somebody got them, and the Rebbe called him a kluginger that's ready to krichn in engen erter. Later in the Farbrengen, the second sicha, when it says in the Hanoch that explaining why even though he said before there won't be a Farbrengen and lepel it change is not called a lie. And he quoted the Rambam, where the Rambam says that if it's a change for the good, it's not called really a change, et cetera, et cetera. But really the way he started the sicha was with these words, "There will be those who will come with tainus that I said there won't be a Farbrengen and lepel there was." And then he added that there are always people who have tainus. And therefore, in order to answer those tainus, I'm gonna explain and explain with the Rambam and explain the whole thing, and that's not called changing the mind because for the good. Even David Shtey, if he says something bad will happen, he changes for the good. That's not called changing his mind. Same thing here, that

02:23 the fact that he changed for the better to make a Farbrengen is not called changing the mind. But he started the sicha by saying that there will be people who will have tainus because tainus felt came on this. There's never missing people who was gonna hurt as tainu- have tainus.