0449 - Hanocha Not Mugah - Edited Part 3

00:01 I'd like to explain a little bit the different titles that we find under Hanachos. And I wanna say that whatever I'm gonna say is only the way it was till the middle of the Lameds. What happened later, since I wasn't involved personally, I cannot say what the Seder was. But what I'm going to explain is how it was till then, till the middle of the Lameds. That is concerning that sometimes you see on the Sicha, it says, "Hanacha bil timugia." Sometimes we see on the Sicha that says, "Hanachos hatmimim bil timugia." Sometimes it says, "Hanacha protis bil timugia." Sometimes it says, "Hanacha" with a Tat, and then it says the word "Bil timugia." Sometimes it says just the word "Hanacha." So I wanna explain all the different things the way it were. In the beginning of the Yud's and also in the beginning of the Chaf's, Reb Yayil was the one that used to write all the Hanachos. And he used to write, "Hanacha bil timugia." From the middle of the Chavo-- of, of the Chaf's, like Chavavan, when the Bochrim started writing the Hanachos, we decided to make a little change, and we decided to write, "Hanachos hatmimim bil timugia," because we felt that since we're only Bochrim and we're not as good as Reb Yayil, so the Hanachos are not as good as Reb Yayil. So to make sure that people know that this is not as good as it used to be, so we changed it and wrote, "Hanachos hatmimim bil timugia."

01:33 But this was only when the Sicha came out officially. In other words, someone wrote the first draft of the Hanacha, and on that it would say, "Hanacha protis," because it was a private Hanacha. Then someone would look it over, or maybe two people would look it over and add and change. Then it came out officially. Not officially from Merkaz, but officially as a stenciled Hanacha. So there it would say, "Hanacha hatmimim bil timugia." But if it never came out in a formal way, and it was left only the way it was written in the first draft, so that remained with the words, "Hanacha protis bil timugia," to show that this is only Hanacha protis. I know if somebody privately for himself wrote a Hanacha, would also write the words just, "Hanacha protis," to show that this is just a private thing and you can't really rely on it so much as is if it would come out formally. When they gave a Sicha to the Rebbe to be Magia, lchatchilah they didn't write the words, "Hanacha bil timugia," because it was given into the Rebbe to be Magia. And when the Rebbe was Magia, that's how it was. So they didn't say anything, not the word, "Hanacha bil timugia," not the word, "Hanacha," et cetera, et cetera. Sometimes when the Rebbe would be Magia Sicha that was given in to be mugia, but the Rebbe didn't-- wasn't Magia it fully, whether not the full thing or not completely in a schleimaztike way, the Rebbe himself

02:56 would write, even though it didn't say these words originally when it was given in, the Rebbe would write the words, "Hanacha bil timugia." But I remember the Rebbe would write, "Hanacha" with a period, "Bil timugia," because beemes al pididuk that's how it's supposed to say. The word Hanacha is Lashon Hakavus, so it really should say, "Hanacha bil timugas." But if you write Hanacha, period, first thing we're saying it's Hanacha. And then we're adding another point. This is bil timugia, that's not edited by the Rebbe. So the Rebbe would write Hanacha with a dot, bil timugia. So those Sichas that have Hanacha, period, bil timugia, 'cause the Rebbe was Magia it, but the Rebbe obviously felt he wasn't Magia it fully, so it's still called bil timugia, but that's how the Rebbe wrote. Sometimes when the Rebbe would be Magia Sicha, that was not lchatchilah intended for the Rebbe to be Magia. Given the Rebbe a copy of the Hanacha the way it was written, so it said the word, "Hanacha bil timugia," but for some reason the Rebbe was Magia, and he left the words, "Hanacha bil timugia," which means the Rebbe also felt that he wasn't Magia completely, so he left those words. But we decided in order for us to be a siman that the Rebbe was Magia the Sicha more or less, we ourselves, when we printed it, we wrote Hanacha, period, bil timugia, to show to us to know a siman that this is something that the Rebbe really, really was

04:07 Magia, partially at least was Magia, so that's how we did it. Sometimes the Rebbe would write on the Sicha just the word Hanacha. In other words, it didn't say anything before because it was given in Rebbe to be Magia, and the Rebbe himself wrote the word Hanacha. He didn't write the word bil timugia, but he wrote just Hanacha. Also to show probably that it's not fully as if he would write it himself. It's just a Hanacha, but it's still a mugia dikah, and it's completely mugia, and therefore the Rebbe wrote the word Hanacha. Now, that also happened sometimes that it, the Rebbe would write the words Reishimas Echad Hashemim. For instance, the Sicha about the Hemshach Samach Vov, which is printed in the back of the Samach Vov, and it's also printed in L'chayil Zayin, look at the Sichas. When the Rebbe was Magia it, he added the words on top, Reishimas Echad Hashemim. Now, probably what it was is because of the same like he would write Hanacha, that this is Hanacha that someone wrote. It's mugia, but it's still, uh, only a Hanacha, but so in this case, he wrote Reishimas Echad Hashemim. It's interesting that when L'chayil Zayin came out and the Sicha was printed there for Beis Nissan, the words Reishimas Echad Hashemim is not written there, and I don't remember what the reason was, but it lapel the Rebbe wrote it that way as you see it in the Samach Vov. This is basically bekitzur the difference in the different

05:22 expressions we have concerning these Sichas.