0263 - Ha'ara in Lekutei Sichos about Beginning of Geula

00:01 In Likutei Sichos Chelek He, at the end of the second sicha to Parshas Vayetzei, which was the Likud that came out in the year of Tov Shin Lamed and later was put into the Sefer Chelek He, there the Rebbe talks about the importance of Mivtzat Film. Then the Rebbe finishes off the sicha by saying that this, meaning Mivtzat Film, will also be a hachana to the coming of Mashiach Tzidkeinu, that after he will come, and only through him, and the Rebbe underlines the word him, there will be the ketz ha'golas, the end of galus. And only after that, as the Ramam says it very clear, will start the aschalta d'gula, the beginning of the gula. In other words, not before. And only after that will be the gula amitas v'hashlema, the real and complete gula. And only after that, and only through Mashiach, will there be kibbutz golius, the korat mamash b'golu ledan, the gathering of the golius. But not before that. This is the order, and it's based on the Ramam. And here you have our order fifty-one, a long order. It's almost a full page where the Rebbe goes into the details that this is the order the way it's supposed to be when Mashiach will come, the way it's gonna be, and trying to describe that what's going on in Eretz Yisroel now cannot at all be considered as aschalta d'gula, as the beginning of the gula. And the Rebbe goes into a lot of details here explaining how it's not aschalta

01:22 d'gula at all. Like the Rebbe said in the Pnim, that the aschalta d'gula will only come after Mashiach is here, and then is the ketz ha'golas, and then will start the aschalta d'gula, and then will go the gula amitas v'hashlema, and then will be kibbutz golius. So what's happening now that even though a lot of Yidden are coming to Eretz Yisroel and we have whatever we have in Eretz Yisroel, it's not aschalta d'gula at all. And the Rebbe in the HaOrah explains it at length. Now one might ask, what's it doing in the sicha? Why is this long, long HaOrah here in the sicha when the whole sicha has nothing to do with this? So let me explain it. A lot of times the people who wrote the sichas prepared for the Rebbe to be Maggia, if there was a certain thing mentioned in the sicha that the Rebbe had written this, about this inyan someplace else, they would put it in. It should become as a HaOrah because then it's taking HaOrah only because it's a side thing, but since he mentions it, they would put it in HaOrah. Now in this inyan that this is datke the seder of the gula, and before that is not kibbutz golius, there's a long letter from the Rebbe to Harav Zevin explaining to him how what's happening in Eretz Yisroel now is not at all, not even aschalta d'gula, it's not at all connected to the gula. Since that was a letter that was written and

02:36 we had the letter, so it was... The point was, and here the Rebbe mentions the difference, the seder of the gula, it's kedai to make a HaOrah, which is the Rebbe wrote it anyway, so it's not a big job because there is a letter already written and it was put in when that sicha was given into the Rebbe as a HaOrah to what it says in the Pnim concerning the seder of the coming of Mashiach, even though it's a side matter, but why not put it in? When the Rebbe was Maggia the sicha, he was Maggia the HaOrah also. And what he really did, he changed the whole letter. He kimat almost, I might say, rewrote the whole HaOrah with new words, and he made it even sharper the way, than the way it was in the original letter written to Harav Zevin, added so many things and made it much sharper and much clearer that what's going on now is not kibbutz golius and it's not the aschalta d'gula at all. And then when the sicha was put into the Sefer, it became part of the Sefer of Likutei Sichos, and it has this HaOrah which was basically rewritten, even though the original one was written already by the Rebbe also to Harav Zevin, but this was rewritten almost completely. And if you look at it, you see how strong the Rebbe is against the inyan that was going on there should be considered aschalta d'gula.